Showing posts with label New Employees. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Employees. Show all posts

Monday, September 12, 2011

SOCIALIZATION | Recruiting, Inducting and Socializing New Employees



It may appear a little unusual that organizations invest significant amounts of time and money recruiting and selecting employees for highly routinized systematic work that they may leave after a relatively short period of time. The main reason for this is that even a highly structured work environment does not guarantee a good quality of service. For this to be achieved it is necessary to socialize all employees and develop a culture of customer service and discretionary effort.
During induction much of the time is spent developing an understanding of systems, products, etc. It is also used to develop values and norms that represent the organization. This is o en done by story telling and recounting events, eg where an adviser went out of her way to solve a problem for a customer that was much more than would be expected. These norms and values are o en printed on cards and given to advisers as well as being printed onto posters and placed on walls throughout the workplace.
Developing a positive ownership of corporate values is sometimes encouraged by specific workshops, eg Servo had a two-day workshop called the Servo Challenge. It had a popularist theme; a welcoming video message from the CEO, and a song: ‘One Team One Goal’. Motivational sessions such as these can buoy up delegates and inspire them to own the corporate values. One employee described how working for Servo was ‘an extreme privilege and only a select few would receive such an opportunity’.
Approaches such as these motivational sessions can have a very positive effect on motivation and morale. However, they are not enough if they are just isolated events, and if this ‘hype’ is not backed up by matching actions in the workplace there will be a disconnect. Employees uplifted by the motivational training and speeches may well return rapidly to earth if the rest of their work experience does not match the training event.
These motivational sessions need to be carefully orchestrated so that they represent reality and appeal to a wide audience. It can be quite easy to disenchant employees if the event is interpreted as superficial or just an import from a culturally distant headquarters. One employee stated that the Servo Challenge was:
A mass brainwashing session where new employees are blinded by the hype that is Servo. Servo was portrayed as a non-conflict company where nobody had differences with each other and all problems could be resolved through discussion. Employees were filled with extravagant hype and expectations of their future with the company. 
In reality, most employees are aware of the nature of these motivational events and evaluate them carefully. While they may feel some of the style is excessive, few have problems with the idea that good customer service is key to success.
Developing a shared identity and values, and encouraging a sociable atmosphere encourages employees to work towards organizational objectives. It also encourages them to ‘walk the extra mile’ with the customer and deliver a service beyond expectations. It is clear that, ‘Organizations that depend on the decision making of employees are likely to pay more attention to their hearts and minds’.

Thursday, September 8, 2011

INDUCTION | Recruiting, Inducting and Socializing New Employees



Most organizations deliver in-house initial basic training for advisers for three reasons:
  1. No external solutions appear to be available.
  2. It is the most cost-effective solution.
  3. It enables employees to be trained in systems, products/offerings and customer service approach
In 2003 the average duration for the induction of agents was 36 working days; however, this reduced significantly to 21 days in 2004. Dimension Data suggested that this might have contributed to the decreases in customer satisfaction and first-contact resolution, and increases in call abandonment and staff attrition during the same period.
The reduction in induction training can be attributed to three main reasons. First, there is pressure to minimize costs and when people are being trained they are not available to generate income for the organization. Secondly, many employees leave before the contact centre has financially recouped its investment in recruitment, training and development. The third reason for reducing the period of induction is that this speeds up the provision of new agents into the workplace.
The average length of induction training for new supervisors and managers is 14 to 15 days. However, many key competency areas are not strongly included, eg management skills, coaching, telephone communication skills, team building skills, call analysis skills, and monitoring/use of statistics.
However, training is not just a cost, it is also an investment in the future production potential of the person. Dimension Data observed that contact centre complexity was increasing with multiple channels, different functions, processes and systems, and increased demands for improved performance. To achieve this it argued that 21 days induction was insufficient for all but the simplest contact centre and suggested a minimum of six weeks induction plus ongoing support in the form of an apprenticeship or buddying system.
To be a nurse adviser in NHS Direct, nurses are required to have five years’ post-qualification experience. To assist nurses to take on their new roles they undergo a fairly lengthy period of training, for example, in the early days of NHS Direct induction training for nurse advisers varied between five and 12 weeks depending on the region. The areas covered included clinical assessment, clinical protocols, ethical issues, accountability, IT skills and telephony. However, at Health-Info CLSC in Quebec, the duration of training was only five or six days and this was believed to be because, ‘The practice of nursing over the phone is therefore a continuity of pre-existing lines and embedded in a nursing methodology central to the education of Quebecois nurses.
In an Australian telecommunications company, new employees had a 10-week full-time training programme followed by up to six months of support at the end of which they were expected to be fully competent. Similarly, in Flightco, an airline booking organization, induction training lasted between eight and 10 weeks and focused on computer and technical skills, products and services, and customer service areas. Following this there were two-monthly performance reviews, which continued for about six to eight months until the agents reached the desired level of proficiency.
Market analysts ContactBabel, also identified that induction courses in most industries lasted approximately three to four weeks. In the utilities sector induction training tends to be approximately five weeks because of the cross-selling and up-selling that are expected.
There would also appear to be a degree of correlation between the size of the contact centre and the length of training. Larger centres tend to have a dedicated training department and the average length of induction is four weeks. Those contact centres with less than 50 agent positions average only 14 days.
Some agents receive only a minimum degree of training. Research by CallNorthWest described a situation where the training was rushed, there were no hand-outs and no opportunities to ask questions, which resulted in one agent feeling like she knew very li le. Furthermore, one agent who had not received induction training and had to teach herself, contemplated resigning and stated, ‘I actually walked out at one point after three days because it was so bad. I used to dread coming in, but they came after me and persuaded me to stay’.
The ability of the trainer also has an impact on the motivation of the agents and the perception of the organization: ‘If you have a bad trainer, especially at induction, it puts you off. Especially the induction phase, you can gauge the quality of the organization through that first induction period’.
In larger organizations with high attrition there can be a permanent demand for new agents, leading to a continuous flow of people passing through induction. In general, there appears to be a common structure for induction training:
  • classroom training on skills, systems, knowledge, etc;
  • practice on systems/computers, etc;
  • listening in on calls;
  • answering calls under supervision;
  • a ‘paddling pool’ or ‘nursery’ where people are under close supervision;
  • placement close to an experienced member of staff or a buddy;
  • regular supervision and frequent checks;
  • normal supervision and assessment.
After induction, training is usually less frequent or even voluntary; however, where there is poor performance training is compulsory. Also, induction training is largely the responsibility of the training department, but after that it is largely the responsibility of the team leader or supervisor.

Induction as assessment

The induction period is used to develop the knowledge, skills and attitudes necessary to work in the contact centre. During this period close attention is given to the inductees so that any areas of weakness can be addressed and improved. Those whose abilities match the necessary standards will be signed off and work alongside more experienced colleagues or buddies. Where people do not come up to standard they may be given additional support and training or, if this is not effective, they may be released. Contracts of employment normally contain the specification that permanent contracts will only be issued to those who reach certain standards during induction or the probationary period.

Induction programme content

A number of guidelines have been published to support the public sector in establishing contact centres. The Scottish Executive recommended that comprehensive induction programmes should address at a minimum level:
  • aims and structure of the organization and the role and purpose of the contact centre;
  • relevant work processes;
  • knowledge of the particular services;
  • customer service techniques across appropriate channels, in other words, telephone, letter, e-mail, etc;
  • IT systems;
  • health and safety;
  • organizational policies and procedures;
  • team building.
Similar guidelines by the Central Office of Information advised government call centres to include the following in induction programmes:
  • aims and structure of the department/organization as a whole, and the role and purpose of the contact centre and how it fits into the rest of the organization;
  • knowledge of particular service(s) as appropriate, the subject matter and the business process of the service;
  • customer service skills, in general terms and specific techniques that can be used across all channels eg, telephone, letter, e-mail;
  • familiarity with IT systems;
  • health and safety;
  • organizational policies and procedures;
  • team building
  • stress management;
  • management training for team leaders.

Sunday, September 4, 2011

ATTITUDE | New Employees



In some cases qualifications are a requirement as in the case of those working in the insurance industry or nursing. In many other situations qualifications are less prized because there is o en no clear correlation between them and the ability to successfully undertake the work.
As the call centre sector develops and matures, traditional industry indicators such as industry bodies, recognized skills and competencies, qualifications, etc will provide structure and shape. These developments will make the industry more formalized and transparent; however, in the interim, recruitment, induction and training processes o en have a greater significance in identifying suitable candidates.
To add complexity to the situation many of the skills used in contact centres are tacit ones hidden deep within people, making it hard for them and observers to describe what skills are being used. For this reason recruitment is o en based on identifying people possessing these inner skills and then selecting them.
Developing broader social knowledge and the ability to recognize a nuance in the voice of a customer and respond appropriately is not something that can be trained in a few weeks of induction. It is possible that some of these tacit skills may only be developed over a very long period of time. It is for these reasons that many employers seek people who possess a wide experience of life, eg running a household and bringing up children.
In addition, managers also seek well motivated individuals who possess a caring attitude, high levels of confidence; are ‘bubbly’ or lively; have a natural ability to talk, develop rapport and smile down the phone. For people who work in technical support, communication skills are less highly valued. Instead, the ability to problem solve is considered more important. In fact, the people in these roles are considered less likely to possess the ‘bubbly’ personalities.
Time and again there would appear to be a consistent message from employers – personality and particularly attitude are the most sought after attributes in job applicants. What is most remarkable is that many of them consider attitude to be something that is very difficult to train. One hotel manager stated that:
We didn’t actually look for people with experience. . . because we felt that wasn’t particularly important. We wanted people that had a personality more than skills, because we felt we could train people to do the job.
Managers at Telebank expressed similar feelings about the innateness of personality, motivation and enthusiasm:
Customer service, that’s not a skill. That’s in you. It’s the attitude towards customer service.
I firmly believe that if you have a CSR who has the right attitude and approach, so long as you’ve got somebody who’s willing to learn, who will be receptive to their feedback and sees it as an opportunity to develop themselves, then I believe that you can get them to where they need to be. 
This emphasis on attitude is also valued in other industries:
The US’s only consistently profitable airline, Southwest Airlines, has been known to turn down a brilliant pilot because he or she was rude to a receptionist. Its mo o is summed up by the phrase, ‘you can train skills, you cannot train attitude’. 
This emphasis on recruiting attitude might be interpreted as meaning that there is little room for training; however, this is not the case. While there may be rough diamonds with a positive attitude in the job market there is still a considerable need for developing these talents and shaping them so that they can be effectively applied in call centres. The remark by the woman entering hospital for a neurological condition sums up this perspective: ‘I don’t want to be operated on by a natural born surgeon, I want someone who has received all the training and has many successful years of experience!’

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

QUALIFICATIONS | New Employees



Qualifications are o en used as a proxy or indicator to demonstrate a person’s ability for a job; for example, a degree in English may indicate that a person has good language skills but in fact these may be written rather than spoken. Alternatively, some applicants may possess few qualifications but still have the skills and personality to successfully accomplish the tasks required. For these reasons, the requirement for qualifications in contact centres would appear to vary depending on the level of operation and nature of the industry. In many organizations attitude is considered more important than qualifications.
Possessing educational qualifications does not indicate that a person possesses the skills necessary to work in contact centres. For organizations that have used qualifications as an indicator of suitability this can cause a problem. Furthermore, there is the ‘indeterminacy of labour’ ie, the difference between the perceived recruitment of skills and their actual translation into profitable outcomes for the organization. ‘Given that traditional indicators are unreliable, the role of selection, recruitment, induction and training in identifying and shaping social competencies is moved to the centre of the stage.’
In some industries regulatory compliance requires employees to possess specific qualifications eg, insurance and finance agents may be required to possess industry qualifications in order to provide advice or sell financial products. In Quebec, nurses working for Health-Info CLSC were expected to have a minimum of three years’ experience. Likewise, in NHS Direct, nurse advisers are required to have at least five years’ post-qualification experience giving them a ‘licence to practice’. On the other hand, the lack of direct patient interaction working on the telephones may lead to de-registration eg, midwives need to assist at a certain number of births over a specific time period.
The call centre industry is a relatively new one and as it matures across the world qualifications will become more developed and recognized. In the UK e-skills (an agency responsible for developing skills in the telecommunications and digital sectors) has identified 63 competencies required to operate in call centres and linked these to Scottish/National Vocational Qualifications. In addition, some universities are now offering Foundation Degrees; The Open University provides a course for call centre managers and the University of Central Lancashire provides postgraduate qualifications including options within an MBA.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...